top of page
Search

PART 5 - REDUCING WORKPLACE ANXIETY - PRIORITIZATION

Writer: Cary Bailey-Findley
Cary Bailey-Findley
Aug 20
7 min read

Updated: Sep 3

A few years ago, I found myself in a company going through a period of transition. After years of steady growth, things plateaued. A new head of HR joined, emphasizing the importance of learning and development, but their actions didn’t match their words. Our team lacked resources, direction, and leadership after my boss left, leaving us to "keep the lights on" with minimal, low-impact projects. 

 

At first, having less to do felt like a break, but as weeks turned into months, the relief gave way to anxiety. Without meaningful work or clear priorities, it felt like our contributions didn’t matter. We worried about our value, and our job security. The ambiguity and lack of purpose became suffocating. 

 

On the flip side, I’ve also faced the opposite problem: being assigned too many priorities without guidance on what truly mattered. At one point, I juggled ten major projects simultaneously, knowing I could realistically deliver three well. But no one told me which three. The uncertainty of whether I was focusing on the right things created constant stress. 

 

In both cases, too little work or too much without clear direction, the root cause was the same: a lack of prioritization. Without clarity around what truly matters, anxiety thrives, and both individuals and teams struggle to perform their best. 

 

Why We Need to Talk About Workplace Anxiety 

 

When we talk about anxiety at work, we’re not talking about clinical diagnoses or panic attacks. We’re talking about the everyday stress, worry, and pressure that so many people carry with them — especially right now. It's the creeping tension that builds up over time. It chips away at focus, connection, and energy. And left unaddressed, it can quietly erode performance, well-being, and team culture. 

 

Workplace anxiety doesn’t come from nowhere. It’s not just about having a bad boss or a tough deadline. Most often, it’s the result of deeper, systemic issues—things that exist across teams and organizations, baked into the culture, communication, and leadership norms. 

 

In this series, we’re exploring seven of the biggest drivers of workplace anxiety — themes that come up again and again in the organizations I work with and the leaders I coach. These aren’t just theoretical problems. They’re patterns I’ve seen in action, and in many cases, lived through myself. 

 

Here’s what we’ll be digging into over the coming months: 

 

  1. Toxic Work Environments – when fear replaces trust, and people feel unsafe to speak up or take risks.  

  2. Imposter Syndrome – when talented people feel like frauds, and anxiety drives perfectionism or paralysis.  

  3. Lack of Supportive Relationships – when workplace connections are strained, shallow, or absent altogether.  

  4. Overwhelming Workloads & Unclear Priorities – when everything feels urgent and nothing feels achievable.  

  5. Neglected Well-Being – when people are burning out, and no one’s paying attention to the toll.  

  6. Resistance to Change – when uncertainty isn’t addressed, and the unknown becomes a threat.  

  7. Personal and Global Stressors – when employees bring real-life challenges into a workplace that isn’t ready to support them. 

 Each article in this series will explore one of these drivers in depth, offering real stories, research-backed insight, and practical tools to help reduce anxiety—whether you’re leading a team or just trying to get through the week with your sanity intact. 

 

As you read in the intro, this month’s article focuses on the importance of setting clear priorities at work, and how, without them, people can really struggle. Let’s dive in. 

 

Research on Prioritization and Workload Clarity 

 

Prioritization is one of the most powerful tools for reducing workplace anxiety. When employees understand what’s important and why, they can align their efforts with clear goals, fostering focus and a sense of purpose. Conversely, unclear or conflicting priorities breed stress, disengagement, and underperformance. 

 

At the organizational level, balancing short-term needs with long-term goals is critical. Kaplan and Norton (1996) highlight that aligning immediate tasks with strategic objectives ensures work feels purposeful and connected to broader success. In my experience, when my team lacked clear departmental priorities, we felt adrift, questioning our value and role in the company’s mission. This uncertainty trickled down to individual performance, amplifying stress and reducing motivation. 

 

At the individual level, prioritization is equally vital. Covey (1989) emphasizes focusing on high-impact tasks while minimizing low-value activities. Leaders play a crucial role in helping employees identify priorities through regular check-ins and workload alignment discussions. Without this clarity, employees often feel overwhelmed or uncertain about where to direct their energy, leading to inefficiency and anxiety. 

 

Finally, clear roles and responsibilities are essential for reducing stress. Ambiguity around who owns specific tasks creates confusion, overlaps, and missed expectations. Hammer and Champy (1993) stress that defining roles and streamlining processes eliminates frustration and fosters confidence. In my experience, when responsibilities were unclear, my team was left second-guessing its purpose, compounding the stress caused by a lack of priorities. 

 

Prioritization and clarity aren’t just productivity tools, they’re anxiety reducers. They provide employees with a roadmap for their efforts, helping them feel valued, secure, and engaged. 

 

Balancing Short-Term and Long-Term Priorities 

 

Balancing short-term needs with long-term goals is a cornerstone of effective leadership. Without this balance, employees can feel overwhelmed by competing demands or disengaged when their work lacks purpose. Prioritization creates clarity, enabling teams to focus on what truly matters. 

 

A practical framework for prioritization is the Strategic Alignment vs. Mandate Matrix, which evaluates tasks based on two key dimensions: alignment with the company’s strategy and whether the task is mandated by leadership or compliance requirements. Tasks are then categorized to guide focus: 

 

  • High Alignment, High Mandate: These are top priorities deserving full attention and resources. 

  • Low Alignment, Low Mandate: These distractions should be eliminated to free up energy. 

  • Mixed Cases: Tasks that require adjustment, either realigning to strategy, minimizing effort, or integrating into larger goals. 

 

This structured approach helps leaders make intentional trade-offs, allowing teams to work efficiently and with purpose. It reduces the ambiguity that often causes stress, ensuring employees understand where their efforts contribute the most value. 

 

Reflecting on my own experience, a framework like this would have been invaluable during the time when my department lacked clear priorities. The absence of direction left us questioning our relevance and fueled anxiety across the team. Clear priorities, even if they were difficult to hear, would have created a sense of stability and focus. 

 

Leaders who embrace prioritization as a strategic tool foster environments where employees feel secure and valued. By balancing immediate needs with future objectives and providing clarity on what truly matters, leaders empower their teams to perform at their best while minimizing unnecessary stress. 

 

Individual Prioritization and Daily Task Management 

 

Helping individuals prioritize their daily tasks is crucial for reducing stress and enhancing productivity. Without clear guidance, employees can feel busy but not effective.  This state often leads to anxiety and frustration. Simple frameworks like the Impact vs. Effort Matrix and the Urgent vs. Important Framework provide clarity and focus. 

 

The Impact vs. Effort Matrix 

 

This tool helps individuals evaluate tasks based on their value and effort: 

 

  • High Impact, Low Effort: Quick wins that should be addressed immediately. 

  • High Impact, High Effort: Strategic projects that require focus and planning. 

  • Low Impact, Low Effort: Non-essential tasks for when time allows. 

  • Low Impact, High Effort: Time sinks to avoid or deprioritize. 

 

By reviewing tasks every few weeks, employees can ensure their efforts are aligned with high-value work, preventing wasted energy on low-impact activities. 

 

The Urgent vs. Important Framework 

 

This framework categorizes tasks by urgency and importance: 

 

  • Urgent and Important: Immediate priorities that demand attention. 

  • Important but Not Urgent: Long-term goals to schedule proactively. 

  • Urgent but Not Important: Tasks to delegate or handle quickly. 

  • Neither Urgent nor Important: Distractions to eliminate. 

 

I’ve used this framework daily by categorizing my tasks each morning, ensuring I focus on what truly matters. Adjusting priorities as new tasks arise keep me organized and reduces overwhelm. 

 

These tools aren’t just valuable for personal task management, they’re also effective in team settings. Leaders can incorporate them into one-on-one check-ins, helping employees align their efforts with organizational goals. This clarity fosters confidence, reduces anxiety, and ensures that everyone is focused on meaningful, impactful work. 

 

Prioritization isn’t just about getting things done. It’s about doing the right things. When individuals know where to focus their energy, they feel empowered and less stressed, contributing to a healthier, more productive work environment. 

 

Clarifying Roles and Responsibilities 

 

Unclear roles and responsibilities are a major source of workplace anxiety. When team members don’t know who is accountable for what, it leads to duplicated efforts, missed tasks, and frustration. Clarity fosters confidence, trust, and efficiency. 

 

Tools like the RACI Framework (Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed) provide a structured way to assign roles. For example: 

 

  • Responsible: The person doing the work. 

  • Accountable: The decision-maker or ultimate owner of the task. 

  • Consulted: Individuals whose input is required. 

  • Informed: Those who need updates but aren’t directly involved. 

 

For decision-making, the RAPID Model (Recommend, Agree, Perform, Input, Decide) helps clarify who does what in the decision-making process. These frameworks prevent misunderstandings and ensure everyone knows their role, reducing stress and improving collaboration. 

 

To implement role clarity effectively: 

 

  1. Identify and document major tasks and responsibilities. 

  2. Assign clear roles using RACI or RAPID. 

  3. Regularly revisit roles to adapt to changing needs. 

  4. Foster open discussions to address gaps or overlaps. 

  5. Encourage ownership and accountability while providing support. 

 

In my own experience, unclear responsibilities created unnecessary tension within teams. Using tools like RACI could have streamlined processes, reduced anxiety, and fostered a stronger sense of purpose. 

 

By ensuring clear roles and responsibilities, leaders create an environment where employees feel confident and valued, enabling them to focus on their best work without second-guessing their contributions. 

 

Prioritization and Clarity as Keys to Reducing Workplace Anxiety 

 

Prioritization and clarity are essential for fostering a workplace where employees feel valued, secure, and empowered. Whether it’s aligning organizational goals, clarifying roles, or helping individuals manage daily tasks, leaders have the responsibility (and the opportunity) to create environments where teams can thrive. 

 

When priorities are clear, employees understand their purpose and feel confident in their contributions. By balancing short-term demands with long-term objectives, leaders ensure that work is both meaningful and sustainable. Tools like the Impact vs. Effort Matrix, the Urgent vs. Important Framework, and frameworks like RACI and RAPID offer practical ways to eliminate ambiguity and guide teams toward focus and alignment. 

 

Reflecting on my experiences, the absence of prioritization and clarity created unnecessary stress, doubt, and inefficiency. In contrast, environments where leaders prioritize direction and transparency empower individuals and teams to perform at their best. Prioritization isn’t just a productivity tool—it’s a vital strategy for reducing anxiety and building trust. 

 

As leaders, we must ask ourselves: are we providing the clarity our teams need? By focusing on what truly matters and communicating it effectively, we can create a culture of purpose, engagement, and confidence that benefits both individuals and organizations. 

 

Cary Bailey-Findley is the founder of Rethink All the Rules and Head of Leadership Development at Deutsche Börse. Through RTR, he designs leadership simulations that put leaders under real pressure, force conscious decisions with no clean answers, and make the consequences of those decisions impossible to ignore.  Learn more at https://rethinkrules.com/.  

 
 

© 2026 by the Findley Companies.  All rights reserved.

The Findley Companies


Tel: 714-630-7136
Email: info@findley-reports.com
Address3808 E. La Palma Avenue

Anaheim, CA 92807

Contact Us
bottom of page